Nancy M. Lewis
Nancy Lewis, adjunct faculty for WGS and Fogler Library’s Head of Reference & Information Literacy, has a recently published a review of Jack Halberstam’s Trans*: A quick and quirky account of gender variability in the journal Resources for Gender and Women’s Studies: A Feminist Review. RGWS is the first to publish this review.
Lewis, N.M. (2019). Open to possibilities: Gender variability and the importance of the asterisk. [Review of the book Trans*: A quick and quirky account of gender variability, by J. Halberstam]. Resources for Gender and Women’s Studies, 40(1), 7.
Student Research Posters - CUGR Symposium 2019
Photos of WGS Majors from the WGS 480 Capstone class with their research posters.
An Intersectional Analysis of Intervention Methods for Intimate Partner Violence
Political Partisanship Regarding Feminist Issues in Current American Politics
Comparative Rhetorical Analysis of Anti-choice and Pro-choice Social Movements
Sex Education: Giving Youth Skills for Lifelong Sexual Health
A Study of Trans Female and Non-Binary Experiences of and Judgement about Motherhood
Dr. Susan K. Gardner
Dr. Mazie Hough
Dr. Mazie Hough is a social historian with an emphasis on women’s reproductive politics, widely construed. Her current research focuses on abortion, infanticide, and rape in Maine at the end of the 19th and beginning of the twentieth centuries. She is interested in how a growing state involvement in the investigation and prosecution of these crimes had a particular impact on rural women. She is also the Maine coordinator for a national data base/web site of suffragists and would welcome anyone who is interested in writing a biography of a Maine woman or who knows of a Maine woman suffragist to get in touch with her.
Dr. Elizabeth Neiman
Between 1790 and 1820, William Lane’s Minerva Press published and circulated an unprecedented number of new novels, many of them by women authors. In recent years Minerva has been written back into Romantic-era literary history (see work by Ina Ferris, Emma Clery, Deirdre Lynch, Michael Gamer, Mathew Grenby, and Anthony Mandal). Particular attention has been paid to Minerva’s exemplary role in inciting Romantic “anxiety,” Lucy Newlyn’s term for the period response to popular print culture. My book argues that Romantic “anxiety” is better conceptualized as an “exchange,” a dynamic interrelationship between Minerva novels and Romantic-era politics and poetics. Minerva’s derivative themes and otherwise “borrowed” material (e.g. character types, fashionable terms and features, such as poetry epigraphs) draw its authors into a shared circuit of production with writers now regarded as canonical, but then competitors for a rapidly expanding readership. I pose two central arguments. First, Minerva novelists react creatively to an increasingly stratified literary market by borrowing the rhetoric of “prolific” print culture (which includes references to the sublime and original genius as well as to circulating-library “trash”) to fashion an actively collaborative rather than passively derivative model of authorship. This model enables authors to contribute to debates over woman’s nature, the social order, and the literary market. Second, Minerva’s authorial model reverberates in Romantic poetics—and in particular, in Percy Shelley’s portrayal of the poet in A Defence of Poetry. Even as Shelley continues the cultural work (begun most prominently by Wordsworth in his preface to Lyrical Ballads) that elevates the poet above all other writers, Shelley’s vision of the ideal poet (impassioned; inspired; prophetic) reflects a deeply social understanding of how the poet comes to compose his verse.