Influence of microscale weak zones on bulk strength
Published: 2016
Publication Name: Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems
Publication URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/2016gc006551
Abstract:
Shear zones have different rheological properties than the surrounding rocks, indicating that the bulk strength of regions containing shear zone networks cannot be determined by considering the host rock rheology alone. We demonstrate the value of this concept at the microscale. We first consider the phase arrangements in naturally deformed rocks and document that weak phases exhibit little interconnection within a microstructure. Rather, three-dimensional weak zones, analogous to viscous shear zones, can interconnect or bridge weak phases. These zones typically form at high stress sites, comprise multiple minerals, and deform by mechanisms independent of those in the surrounding minerals. The presence of weak zones strongly affects the bulk strength of the rock, disproportionate to the mode of the weak zones. For example, the development of 1% mode of a weak zone at a high stress site can reduce the bulk strength of the rock nearly an order of magnitude. Calculation of the bulk strength of the rock by some averaging algorithm of the deformation mechanisms operating outside the weak zones will overestimate strength. Instead, accurate calculations and predictions of bulk strength require accounting for the presence and geometry of weak zones. For this reason, we advocate use of the scale-independent conceptual rheological model of interconnected weak zones or layers rather than that of interconnected weak phases. More generally, the way forward in improving quantification of the mechanical properties of the lithosphere requires recognizing and explicitly accounting for the spatial and temporal distribution of deformation mechanisms operating throughout a rock.
Gerbi, C., Johnson, S. E., Shulman, D., & Klepeis, K. (2016). Influence of microscale weak zones on bulk strength. Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems, 17(10), 4064–4077. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016gc006551