{"id":678,"date":"2014-08-12T13:22:21","date_gmt":"2014-08-12T17:22:21","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/umaine.edu\/jmb\/?page_id=678"},"modified":"2018-09-12T13:59:20","modified_gmt":"2018-09-12T17:59:20","slug":"volume-25-number-4-autumn-2004","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/umaine.edu\/jmb\/back-issues\/2004-2\/volume-25-number-4-autumn-2004\/","title":{"rendered":"Volume 25, Number 4, Autumn"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"color: #000000;text-align: left\"><span class=\"articleheading\" style=\"font-weight: bold;color: #000000\"><a id=\"v25n4at2004ab1\" style=\"color: #000000\"><\/a>The Emperor is Naked Again: Comments on Schlinger\u2019s Assessment of Psychological Theory<\/span><br \/>\n<span class=\"articleauthor\">Robert E. Lana, Temple University<\/span><br \/>\n<span class=\"articleindex\">The Journal of Mind and Behavior, Autumn 2004, Volume 25, Number 4, Pages 271\u2013276, ISSN 0271\u20130137<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: left\"><span class=\"articleabstract\">Periodically in the history of psychology the state of the field is examined to determine its progress since the last assessment was made (e.g., Koch, 1993; Skinner 1977; Spence 1956). On occasion, the conclusion is drawn that progress is either minimal or non existent. Such a conclusion usually takes the form of questioning psychology\u2019s success in developing theoretical statements, or indeed statements in any context, that successfully allow for consistent prediction of the phenomenon in question. Just such an assessment has recently been offered by Schlinger (2004) in this journal.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: left\"><span class=\"articlerequests\">Requests for reprints should be sent to Robert E. Lana, Ph.D., Department of Psychology, Weiss Hall, Temple University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19122.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"color: #000000;text-align: left\"><span class=\"articleheading\" style=\"font-weight: bold;color: #336699\"><a id=\"v25n4at2004ab2\"><\/a><span style=\"color: #000000\">How Psychology Can Keep Its Promises: A Response to Lana<\/span><\/span><br \/>\n<span class=\"articleauthor\">Henry D. Schlinger, California State University, Northridge and Los Angeles and University of California, Los Angeles<\/span><br \/>\n<span class=\"articleindex\">The Journal of Mind and Behavior, Autumn 2004, Volume 25, Number 4, Pages 277\u2013286, ISSN 0271\u20130137\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: left\"><span class=\"articleabstract\">In my article, \u201cWhy Psychology Hasn\u2019t Kept Its Promises\u201d (Schlinger, 2004), I argued that psychology hasn\u2019t become the science its practitioners had hoped because psychologists continue to focus on mentalistic constructs and they adhere to a methodology that emphasizes statistical inference over experimental analysis. I concluded that in order to better keep their promise of a psychological science, psychologists should return to studying the relationship between observed behavior and its context with the type of experimental analysis that characterizes the other experimental sciences. In his reply, Lana (2004, this issue) suggests that there may be aspects of human social and verbal behavior that are so complex that we may not be able to carry out a solid experimental analysis, thus limiting what we can discover about our own nature. Lana concludes that the methodologies needed to understand these more complex social relationships are hermeneutic and historical rather than experimental in nature. I concur with Lana both that an experimental analysis of much of human behavior may not be possible and that psychologists must, therefore, rely on complementary descriptive, interpretive, and historical analyses. I argue, however, that the interpretive language and the historical hindsight must be based on a foundation of basic principles derived from the systematic experimental analysis of behavior.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: left\"><span class=\"articlerequests\">Requests for reprints should be sent to Henry D. Schlinger, Ph.D., Department of Psychology, California State University, Northridge, 18111 Nordhoff Street, Northridge, California, 91330\u20138255. Email: hschling@csun.edu<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"color: #000000;text-align: left\"><span class=\"articleheading\" style=\"font-weight: bold;color: #336699\"><span style=\"color: #000000\"><a id=\"v25n4at2004ab3\" style=\"color: #000000\"><\/a>A Logico-mathematic, Structural Methodology: Part III, Theoretical, Evidential, and Corroborative Bases of a New Cognitive Unconscious for Sub-literal (SubLit) Cognition and Language<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><br \/>\n<span class=\"articleauthor\">Robert E. Haskell, University of New England<\/span><br \/>\n<span class=\"articleindex\">The Journal of Mind and Behavior, Autumn 2004, Volume 25, Number 4, Pages 287\u2013322, ISSN 0271\u20130137<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: left\"><span class=\"articleabstract\">This second companion paper to a logico-mathematic, structural methodology (Haskell, 2003a) and its findings address theoretical issues underlying sub-literal (SubLit) phenomena. The concept of a \u201ccognitive psycho-dynamics\u201d is introduced. In addition, research on masked priming and automatic activation of \u201cchronic goals and motives\u201d schemata are presented as initial and partial explanatory theoretical bases. Corroborating findings from fMRI and other neurological research suggest that some of the cognitive operations are biologically based. A biological evolutionary framework is then presented to explain the origin and development of SubLit cognition and lexical referents. Implications are discussed throughout.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: left\"><span class=\"articlerequests\">Requests for reprints should be sent to Robert E. Haskell, Ph.D., 470 3rd Street South, The Beacon, Unit 909, St. Petersburg, Florida 33701. Email: haskellre@skywaymail.com Alt: rhaskell@une.edu<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"color: #000000;text-align: left\"><span class=\"articleheading\" style=\"font-weight: bold;color: #336699\"><a id=\"v25n4at2004ab4\"><\/a><span style=\"color: #000000\">\u201cTo See Things Is To Perceive What They Afford\u201d: James J. Gibson\u2019s Concept of Affordance\u00a0<\/span><\/span><br \/>\n<span class=\"articleauthor\">Thomas Natsoulas, University of California, Davis\u00a0<\/span><br \/>\n<span class=\"articleindex\">The Journal of Mind and Behavior, Autumn 2004, Volume 25, Number 4, Pages 323\u2013348, ISSN 0271\u20130137\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: left\"><span class=\"articleabstract\">Gibson distinguishes among the properties of environmental things their affordances, which he identifies in terms of that which a thing offers an animal for good or ill. In large part, this article considers his conception of environmental affordances and visually perceiving them, with special attention to the concept of affordance that he exercises in the presentation of his conception. Particular emphasis is placed here on (a) the distinction between the affordance properties of things themselves, and what it is that these things afford an animal, what they enable owing to those properties, and (b) the proposal that the affordances of environmental things are not experiential; they are not properties of the perceptual experiences produced in the process of perceiving them. This does not deny that experiences themselves too possess affordance properties \u2014 for example, they are such as to enable specific behaviors \u2014 but these affordances are not that which is perceived, according to Gibson, when engaged in the activity of straightforward perceiving. The stream of perceptual experience that is part and product of the latter activity is at all points outwardly directed, not directed upon itself.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: left\"><span class=\"articlerequests\">Requests for reprints should be sent to Thomas Natsoulas, 635 SW Sandalwood Street, Corvallis, Oregon 97333. Email: tnatsoulas@ucdavis.edu<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"color: #000000;text-align: left\"><span class=\"articleheading\" style=\"font-weight: bold;color: #336699\"><a id=\"v25n4at2004ab5\"><\/a><span style=\"color: #000000\">Naturalized Perception Without Information<\/span><\/span><br \/>\n<span class=\"articleauthor\">John Dilworth, Western Michigan University\u00a0<\/span><br \/>\n<span class=\"articleindex\">The Journal of Mind and Behavior, Autumn 2004, Volume 25, Number 4, Pages 349\u2013368, ISSN 0271\u20130137\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: left\"><span class=\"articleabstract\">The outlines of a novel, fully naturalistic theory of perception are provided, that can explain perception of an object X by organism Z in terms of reflexive causality. On the reflexive view proposed, organism Z perceives object or property X just in case X causes Z to acquire causal dispositions reflexively directed back upon X itself. This broadly functionalist theory is potentially capable of explaining both perceptual representation and perceptual content in purely causal terms, making no use of informational concepts. However, such a reflexive, naturalistic causal theory must compete with well entrenched, supposedly equally naturalistic theories of perception that are based on some concept of information, so the paper also includes some basic logical, naturalistic and explanatory criticisms of such informational views.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: left\"><span class=\"articlerequests\">Requests for reprints should be sent to John Dilworth, Ph.D., Department of Philosophy, Western Michigan University, Kalamazoo, Michigan 49008. Email: dilworth@wmich.edu<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"color: #000000;text-align: left\"><span class=\"sectionsubheading\" style=\"font-weight: bold\">Book Review<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"color: #000000;text-align: left\"><em><span class=\"articleheading\" style=\"color: #336699\">Dimensions of Apeiron: A Topological Phenomenology of Space, Time and Individuation<\/span><\/em><br \/>\nBook Author:\u00a0<span class=\"articleauthor\">Steven M. Rosen. Amsterdam\/New York: Editions Rodopi, B.V. Value Inquiry Book Series # 154, 2004.\u00a0<\/span><br \/>\n<span class=\"articleauthor\">Reviewed by John R. Wikse, Shimer College<\/span><br \/>\n<span class=\"articleindex\">The Journal of Mind and Behavior, Autumn 2004, Volume 25, Number 4, Pages 369\u2013372, ISSN 0271\u20130137\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: left\"><span class=\"articleabstract\">[Note: First paragraph, no abstract available.] In this challenging, integrative work, Steven Rosen explores the roots of the crisis of postmodernity: the widespread \u201cfragmentation of human culture.\u201d In doing so, he attempts to rethink space, time and individuality \u201cfrom the ground up.\u201d He asks us to turn around and withdraw the projections of Cartesian and Einsteinian space\u2013time, so that we may embrace the \u201cembodied fusion of subject and object that constitutes the paradox of apeiron\u201d \u2014 of the limitless, the boundless, the indeterminate. Developing Martin Heidegger\u2019s meditations on early Greek thinking, Rosen invites us to reverse our most basic assumptions. This involves questioning the peculiarly modern Western markers for the self\u2013world relation: our subjective inclination to create meaning through quantification and measurement and our technologically driven possessive object orientation. In order to suspend the classical epistemological assumptions of \u201cobject-in-space-before-subject,\u201d we must abandon our quest for self-contained \u201cegoic unity,\u201d what we might call our \u201cidiocy\u201d (Grk. idiotes, private, separate person). We need to learn \u2014 as Parmenides said at the dawn of philosophy \u2014 the untrembling heart of unconcealment.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: left\"><span class=\"articlerequests\">Requests for reprints should be sent to John R. Wikse, Ph.D., Department of Integrative Studies, Shimer College, Box 500, Waukegan, Illinois 60079. Email: jackw@shimer.edu<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The Emperor is Naked Again: Comments on Schlinger\u2019s Assessment of Psychological Theory Robert E. Lana, Temple University The Journal of Mind and Behavior, Autumn 2004, Volume 25, Number 4, Pages 271\u2013276, ISSN 0271\u20130137 Periodically in the history of psychology the state of the field is examined to determine its progress since the last assessment was [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1232,"featured_media":0,"parent":104,"menu_order":4,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"_kad_blocks_custom_css":"","_kad_blocks_head_custom_js":"","_kad_blocks_body_custom_js":"","_kad_blocks_footer_custom_js":"","_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-678","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.2 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Volume 25, Number 4, Autumn - The Journal of Mind and Behavior - University of Maine<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/umaine.edu\/jmb\/back-issues\/2004-2\/volume-25-number-4-autumn-2004\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Volume 25, Number 4, Autumn - The Journal of Mind and Behavior - University of Maine\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"The Emperor is Naked Again: Comments on Schlinger\u2019s Assessment of Psychological Theory Robert E. Lana, Temple University The Journal of Mind and Behavior, Autumn 2004, Volume 25, Number 4, Pages 271\u2013276, ISSN 0271\u20130137 Periodically in the history of psychology the state of the field is examined to determine its progress since the last assessment was [&hellip;]\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/umaine.edu\/jmb\/back-issues\/2004-2\/volume-25-number-4-autumn-2004\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"The Journal of Mind and Behavior\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-09-12T17:59:20+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/umaine.edu\/jmb\/back-issues\/2004-2\/volume-25-number-4-autumn-2004\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/umaine.edu\/jmb\/back-issues\/2004-2\/volume-25-number-4-autumn-2004\/\",\"name\":\"Volume 25, Number 4, Autumn - The Journal of Mind and Behavior - University of Maine\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/umaine.edu\/jmb\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2014-08-12T17:22:21+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-09-12T17:59:20+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/umaine.edu\/jmb\/back-issues\/2004-2\/volume-25-number-4-autumn-2004\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/umaine.edu\/jmb\/back-issues\/2004-2\/volume-25-number-4-autumn-2004\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/umaine.edu\/jmb\/back-issues\/2004-2\/volume-25-number-4-autumn-2004\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/umaine.edu\/jmb\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Back Issues\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/umaine.edu\/jmb\/back-issues\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"2004\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/umaine.edu\/jmb\/back-issues\/2004-2\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":4,\"name\":\"Volume 25, Number 4, Autumn\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/umaine.edu\/jmb\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/umaine.edu\/jmb\/\",\"name\":\"The Journal of Mind and Behavior\",\"description\":\"Dedicated to the interdisciplinary approach within psychology and related fields\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/umaine.edu\/jmb\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Volume 25, Number 4, Autumn - The Journal of Mind and Behavior - University of Maine","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/umaine.edu\/jmb\/back-issues\/2004-2\/volume-25-number-4-autumn-2004\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Volume 25, Number 4, Autumn - The Journal of Mind and Behavior - University of Maine","og_description":"The Emperor is Naked Again: Comments on Schlinger\u2019s Assessment of Psychological Theory Robert E. Lana, Temple University The Journal of Mind and Behavior, Autumn 2004, Volume 25, Number 4, Pages 271\u2013276, ISSN 0271\u20130137 Periodically in the history of psychology the state of the field is examined to determine its progress since the last assessment was [&hellip;]","og_url":"https:\/\/umaine.edu\/jmb\/back-issues\/2004-2\/volume-25-number-4-autumn-2004\/","og_site_name":"The Journal of Mind and Behavior","article_modified_time":"2018-09-12T17:59:20+00:00","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/umaine.edu\/jmb\/back-issues\/2004-2\/volume-25-number-4-autumn-2004\/","url":"https:\/\/umaine.edu\/jmb\/back-issues\/2004-2\/volume-25-number-4-autumn-2004\/","name":"Volume 25, Number 4, Autumn - The Journal of Mind and Behavior - University of Maine","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/umaine.edu\/jmb\/#website"},"datePublished":"2014-08-12T17:22:21+00:00","dateModified":"2018-09-12T17:59:20+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/umaine.edu\/jmb\/back-issues\/2004-2\/volume-25-number-4-autumn-2004\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/umaine.edu\/jmb\/back-issues\/2004-2\/volume-25-number-4-autumn-2004\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/umaine.edu\/jmb\/back-issues\/2004-2\/volume-25-number-4-autumn-2004\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/umaine.edu\/jmb\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Back Issues","item":"https:\/\/umaine.edu\/jmb\/back-issues\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"2004","item":"https:\/\/umaine.edu\/jmb\/back-issues\/2004-2\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":4,"name":"Volume 25, Number 4, Autumn"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/umaine.edu\/jmb\/#website","url":"https:\/\/umaine.edu\/jmb\/","name":"The Journal of Mind and Behavior","description":"Dedicated to the interdisciplinary approach within psychology and related fields","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/umaine.edu\/jmb\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"}]}},"taxonomy_info":[],"featured_image_src_large":false,"author_info":{"display_name":"rruss","author_link":"https:\/\/umaine.edu\/jmb\/author\/rruss\/"},"comment_info":0,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/umaine.edu\/jmb\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/678","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/umaine.edu\/jmb\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/umaine.edu\/jmb\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/umaine.edu\/jmb\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1232"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/umaine.edu\/jmb\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=678"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/umaine.edu\/jmb\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/678\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3252,"href":"https:\/\/umaine.edu\/jmb\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/678\/revisions\/3252"}],"up":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/umaine.edu\/jmb\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/104"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/umaine.edu\/jmb\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=678"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}